how low can you go

There is evidence of a policy that punished young people for not having any documents - by increasing their age. Then, when documents could be produced proving age, there was no change in the 'punishment'. At first it can appear this was simply a method for reducing the support, for if a child reached 18 earlier as a result of the punishment, the State saved money. However, this 'punishment' also had other consequences that led to imprisonment in a holding centre (Like Kallered for example) and even deportation. It led to a constant fear of arrest, even at school in front of friends. It also led to suicides in cases that were later re-assessed and found to be incorrect. We replaced hopes with lies, trust with fear, belief with disillusionment.
The power of Migrationverket to dismiss evidence, to dismiss experience based opinion from others in contrast to their own inexperienced based opinions, to use unqualified opinion as 'evidence' in a so-called court (a secret court at that) has echoes of a radical authoritarian nationalism usually known as fascism. Is this really Sweden today? Has respect for the rule of law been so prostituted?
Many leaders quote that each case is individual and decided by the courts.My investigations cause me to challenge this.There appears to be a deliberate and widespread policy involved  that denies individual case assessment. Is this really Sweden today?
We do not protect our society by lowering our standards. Nor does Sweden serve itself well in the world when such revealed lowered standards become the catalyst for scandal at home as with the medical age assessment scandal. Why did the Swedish taxpayers have to pay for such betrayal of Swedish decency ?