Wednesday, January 10, 2018

back doors…escapes from responsibility

I have been asked to explain about my ‘laws with backdoors’ comment on the posting from 2 days ago
https://sweden.blogspot.nl/2018/01/rip-swedish-decency.html
So, here is a screen shot of a section from Migrationsverkets website:
self supporting permanent
Things to note about this ‘law’ and it’s getout clauses (back doors).
1. Afghanistan is not considered by Sweden to be an ‘at war’ country. Most of the rest of the world considers it so, the UN listing it as a class 1 warzone (same as Syria).The US Congress (July 2017) confirmed it as the worst place in the world for terrorist organisations. Now, according to security information, ISIS has moved in!
2. The under 18 reference is critical to understanding why an asylum seeker’s age was artificially increased by a Migationsverket employee (with no experience) at first interview who had worked in the agency for just 5 months and left one month later. This meant that  a ‘secret court’ could be held (normally held if requested by an under 18 seeker,but in many cases not requested by the seeker) for someone who Migrationsverket claimed was 18 years and 10 months old !  Very strange!
3. The increased age was a ‘punishment’ for having no documentation. When this documentation was later obtained, it did not cause the age ‘to be reduced’.
4. Even though the person had been provided with accommodation (at no cost to the Swedish State), a guaranteed income if continuing at school (at no cost to the Swedish State-provided by persons of European origin and non-muslim), a part time (if at school) or full time job…..these things were not considered by the court and were dismissed as irrelevant by Migrationsverket.
5.If the grounds for protection are shown to be other than ‘simply being a war zone’, for example having been kidnapped and therefore subject to reprisal if returned (refoulement), it is of no consequence ….as things such as evidence and facts do not enter into the consideration of this Swedish Migration Court system.
In other words, as with the medical age assessment scandal, Sweden is inflicting debilitating injury upon it’s own integrity and reputation in the world. The asylum seeker issues are not the cause of these deteriorating standards, but simply the catalyst for the manifestation of the problem.

see also





No comments:

Contact

You may contact the writer of this blog at:

sasgg@protonmail.com



Search This Blog