Sunday, April 17, 2022

Wednesday, September 22, 2021

The Great Disappointment

 In fear of a power loss to a small minority of xenophobic politicians, centre left politics have moved more to the right in many countries in Europe.

The main horse cart used to effect this ‘slide on ice’ has been the subject of immigration.

 

Despite more than 80% of Swedes NOT having deep prejudice towards asylum seekers from war torn lands, Swedish politics has moved more and more to disgrace the reputation of Sweden as a caring and compassionate society.(the Red Cross, Save the Children and the Church of Sweden commissioned a survey by Novus,in August.74 percent say yes to children who have lived in Sweden for several years and learned Swedish and should have an opportunity to stay here. Only 14 percent say no)

 

 ‘Open Hearts’ and ‘No walls’ speeches from Prime Ministers, that were interpreted by non-swedish speakers worldwide as invitations to come to Sweden soon morphed into panic modes that produced new ‘pseudo laws’ and restrictions.These were followed by condemnations from Sweden’s own Higher Courts and from the European Court of Human Rights about the lack of modern and honest legal practices within Swedish ‘migration’ courts. The ‘asylum scandal’ has shown the appalling shortcomings of an outdated legal system and a horrific 3rd world standard of juris prudence in Sweden..

 

Buried within all this has been the economic facts, often grossly distorted by xenophobic minions screaming like alley cats. Facts that clearly demonstrate the ‘asylum surge’ of 2015 was a direct financial benefit to countries like Sweden and Germany.

When Angela Merkel said ‘ Wir schaffen das’ (we’ll manage this), she - along with Messrs Reinfeldt and Lofven - understood the financial implications. In Germany, more than half the 1.7 million asylum seekers who came between 2015 and 2019 are now working and paying taxes.

 

In Sweden both Prime Ministers understood the mechanism of utilising asylum seekers as a means of recovering vast amounts of money from Foreign Aid to spend at home and also understood the effect on rural areas of such an injection of money and resources(figures suggest as much as 30% of Foreign Aid was ‘clawed back’ to be spent on refugees in Sweden in 2016.In 2013 this amount was 18%-OECD figure).

 

Peo Hansen (Professor of Political Science,Linkoping Universitet) reminds us of the true cost of migration policy when he points out that in the years 2016 and 2017, when the government paid out the most money for asylum seekers costs,there was a large surplus in tax intake, the largest for decades.(see also https://discoversociety.org/2021/04/07/the-true-economics-of-migration/ ).

In August 2021 this SURPLUS was 43 Billion.

 

The OECD and many other leading, reputable sources, confirm that the so called ‘asylum surge’ of 2015 was a direct and substantial financial benefit to Sweden’s economy.

Just ask yourself, when in the last 20 years have Kommunes up and down this country been in surplus the most? The answer refutes the words of xenophobic politicians.

 

Having used extremely questionable legal,moral and economic tactics to drive asylum seekers out and into other EU lands (Germany and France for example who generally would not practice forced deportations) Sweden is still left with around 9000 asylum seekers who ‘live in the shadows’.Asylum seekers who went to Swedish schools.Asylum seekers who learnt Swedish.Asylum seekers who are not recognised in the society and who are not even allowed to find work to support themselves.Asylum seekers where the Swedish taxpayer has invested tens of thousands of SeK so that they could repay taxes in the future and contribute to even more tax surplus.

 

Thankfully there are many ‘true Swedes’ who help and support these that 'this un-Swedish system' has created as 'sub-human' (remember, we have heard that before in Europe!).

But there can be no denying that the current attitudes of leading Swedish politicians is........a great disappointment....to Swedes who value their country’s reputation and dignity.

Real Swedes have 9000 heart-breaaking reasons to be angry,huh?

Friday, September 20, 2019

the mark of maturity is the way we correct our mistakes


gå ner för svensk text

(society is mankinds work if something is wrong we can change it)



text i Svensk

De flesta medborgare kan förstå en politisk felberäkning. Vi förväntar oss trots allt inte att våra ledare ska ha psykiska krafter eller kunna se alla saker i framtiden.

Sådana felberäkningar kan förlåtas när de bekännas och när korrigerande åtgärder, baserat på de inneboende och traditionella värdena i våra samhällen, utförs.

Det ber emellertid alltför mycket av medborgarna att vi står ledigt medan missbedömningar eller felberäkningar resulterar i effektiva dödsdomar på människor som vi har lärt känna som nådiga, välskötta, tacksamma och stolta. Domar pålagda som ett resultat av ett dysfunktionellt rättssystem och bedräglig migrationsavdelning.

Detta blir ännu mer surrealistiskt när vår egen regering försöker berätta för en pragmatisk värld att Afghanistan är säkert och vi med kraft kan deportera ungdomar tillbaka som har väntat i en delstat limbo i flera år

Det blir omoraliskt och patentiskt un-svenska när vår regering försöker täcka den egna felberäkningen genom att fritt inbjuda dessa unga människor att komma till oss .... och sedan tillverka ursäkt efter ursäkt för varför de inte kan stanna.

De flesta medborgare kan förstå ... till och med förlåta ... en politisk felberäkning.

De flesta medborgare kommer aldrig att förlåta prostitutionen för sina traditioner och moraliska värden som ett resultat av bedrägligt och olagligt metoder som används för att täcka sådana felberäkningar.

Med varje tvingad deportation tillbaka till Afghanistan, förråder den svenska regeringen essensen av svensk tradition.

Att gömma sig i kamouflage av extremhögra åsikter kommer inte att radera skuldbördan och skam som den svenska nationen kommer att drabbas under de kommande åren

.


empty words Sweden



So much for your promises, over decades, of NON-REFOULEMENT

The forcible deportation of an asylum seeker is unlawful...even according to the Swedish Aliens Act

Forced deportations are unlawful



and especially unlawful when the method used to obtain a deportation court order has ignored instructions from the Higher court....
...and broken Swedish law
...and broken EU law

Saturday, December 15, 2018

Tuesday, December 11, 2018

join facebook group?

If you have an interest to join the facebook group dealing with the scandal of young Afghan Asylum seekers, who came at the invitation of 2 Swedish Prime Ministers - and most of which are now homeless, penniless and despite decades of promises from Sweden about Non-Refoulement - now live in fear of deportation to the war zone hell that is Afghanistan today.

You can join here:
Se-asylum scandal
Public group · 56 members
Join Group
This is about the regulatory and legal scandal surrounding the issue of under 18 (when they arrived and applied) asylum seekers in Sweden, especially ...

Monday, December 10, 2018

3rd world 3rd rate product.

My disappointment with Sweden’s Migration Agency
Is not based on humanitarian reasons - though I have thousands of those!

My disgust with Sweden is based on the following:

1. Sweden has politicised courts.Don’t just take my word for it - take the words of your own Constitutional Committee chaired by Andreas Norlen.What modern western democracy does not have an independent judiciary ?

2. 2 Swedish Prime Ministers (Reinfeldt + Lovfen) made a verbal contract- well reported in the world media - a contract they did not change until November 2015.This contract invited refugees to come to Sweden. Deporting young Afghans who accepted this invitation is a disgrace and casts serious doubts upon the integrity of Sweden.

3. The Migration Agency,paid with taxpayer money,refuses to accept what the whole world understands - Afghanistan is in a state of war and no place is safe.This attitude makes a mockery of any concept that Sweden lives in the real world.

4. Sweden pays out massive sums in foreign aid, yet when Sweden pulled back some of this money in 2016 to spend at home to deal with the refugee influx created by the Prime Minister invitations, it was of enormous benefit to the Swedish economy.Spending the aid money at home was a good pre-election policy.Now you give away so much money in foreign aid that you cannot even control where it is spent (Sida) yet you try to tell the taxpayer that asylum seekers are expensive.

5. Sweden dare not even keep proper records of what happens in these politicised courts.It is to be hoped that your own Swedish children do not also have to face such a system, because then you will be angry enough to protest in the streets.

6. For decades Sweden has promised the world it would not practice the forced return of a refugee to a place where the refugee has real reason to fear for their life and safety. For decades Sweden has promised this.For decades your taxpayer money has been used for this purpose, supporting this promise. Has all that taxpayer money been wasted?All that investment in Swedish decency been for nothing?

The young Afghan asylum seekers have done the Swedish taxpayer a BIG service. Their suffering at the hands of a callous and distorted system shows the Swedish taxpayer exactly what they are getting for their tax money - and it is a 3rd world 3rd rate product.

So, put to one side (if you really can) the humanitarian aspects of this appalling scenario - and just think of yourselves. Are these poor standards what you expect for your tax money?

Did you know your tax money pays wages to people who cannot even measure someone’s height properly (but makes them 10 cms taller).

Did you know your tax money pays all the court officials to sit in a court where the decision appears to have been taken even before the court sits? The ‘court’ is simply a PR job so you can think everything is ’legal’ but a system you would not want your own son or daughter to have to face.

Did you know your tax money pays the wages of someone who sits in a comfortable office and makes decisions without any reference to the facts of a case - and their ill chosen decisions costs the lives of so many young people who have committed suicide on Swedish soil, rather than be returned to hell? Your tax money paid for this !

So, put to one side (if you really can) the humanitarian aspects of this appalling scenario - and just think of yourselves. Are these poor standards what you expect for your tax money?

Contact

You may contact the writer of this blog at:

sasgg@protonmail.com



Search This Blog